<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cyberenviro.org &#187; ACLU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberenviro.org/tag/aclu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberenviro.org</link>
	<description>the political ecology of informational development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Government Hypocrisy: Protect Intellectual Property, Collect Personal Data</title>
		<link>http://cyberenviro.org/2011/government-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberenviro.org/2011/government-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gtdonovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregorydonovan.org/cyberenviro/?p=2080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike German, ACLU policy counsel and former FBI agent, was recently on Reason.tv discussing domestic surveillance in post-9/11 America. German covers the U.S. government&#8217;s growing interest in collecting personal data, the development of data fusion centers, and the erosion of &#8230; <a href="http://cyberenviro.org/2011/government-hypocrisy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike German, ACLU policy counsel and former FBI agent, <a href="http://youtu.be/HruJVj2-5mU" target="_blank">was recently on Reason.tv</a> discussing domestic surveillance in post-9/11 America. German covers the U.S. government&#8217;s growing interest in collecting personal data, the development of <a href="http://torinmonahan.com/papers/FC-SD.pdf" target="_blank">data fusion centers</a>, and the erosion of existing privacy protections.</p>
<p>Speaking specifically about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution" target="_blank">4th Amendment</a>, Brown explains:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The way the 4th Amendment protections work with your personal papers, requires probable cause and a warrant before the government can search your desk to look through your papers. Unfortunately, now most of our personal papers are kept on 3rd party servers. It&#8217;s our email that&#8217;s stored remotely. Every thought that we have we hit the search engines to find out more about the subject we&#8217;re thinking bout. All that gets recorded by 3rd parties, and that information doesn&#8217;t have the same 4th Amendment protections.</em></p>
<p>The hypocrisy is extraordinary. For decades the U.S. government has extended and enhanced intellectual property protections. The rationale has been that the laws governing property ownership in the physical environment must also apply in the digital environment. Downloading a Beatles album from Pirate Bay is treated the same as shoplifting a Beatles album from Walmart. But, when it comes to personal property in the digital environment (i.e. your data) we see an erosion of what little protections existed in the physical environment. In short: protect intellectual property, collect personal data.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HruJVj2-5mU" frameborder="0" width="550" height="339"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberenviro.org/2011/government-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU Report: Policing Free Speech: Police Surveillance and Obstruction of First Amendment‐Protected Activity</title>
		<link>http://www.aclu.org/free-speech-national-security/policing-free-speech-police-surveillance-and-obstruction-first-amendme</link>
		<comments>http://www.aclu.org/free-speech-national-security/policing-free-speech-police-surveillance-and-obstruction-first-amendme#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gtdonovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregorydonovan.org/cyberenviro/?guid=6d3d4bb0d808b8d560ad12c86e47abcd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the report: "Americans have been put under surveillance or harassed by the police for deciding to organize, march, protest, espouse unusual viewpoints, and engage in normal, innocuous behaviors such as writing notes or taking photographs in public. <a href="http://www.aclu.org/free-speech-national-security/policing-free-speech-police-surveillance-and-obstruction-first-amendme">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; From the report: "Americans have been put under surveillance or harassed by the police for deciding to organize, march, protest, espouse unusual viewpoints, and engage in normal, innocuous behaviors such as writing notes or taking photographs in public.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberenviro.org/2010/aclu-report-policing-free-speech-police-surveillance-and-obstruction-of-first-amendment%e2%80%90protected-activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Daily News: NYPD tracking cell phone owners, foes aren&#8217;t sure it&#8217;s legal</title>
		<link>http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/10/08/2009-10-08_number_please_nypd_tracking_cell_phone_owners_but_foes_arent_sure_practice_is_le.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/10/08/2009-10-08_number_please_nypd_tracking_cell_phone_owners_but_foes_arent_sure_practice_is_le.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gtdonovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nypd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregorydonovan.org/cyberenviro/?guid=929f01df6db1c313d036499641f45c21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the article: "A recent internal memo says that when cops make an arrest, they should remove the suspect's cell phone battery to avoid leakage - then jot down the International Mobile Equipment Identity number." <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/10/08/2009-10-08_number_please_nypd_tracking_cell_phone_owners_but_foes_arent_sure_practice_is_le.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; From the article: "A recent internal memo says that when cops make an arrest, they should remove the suspect's cell phone battery to avoid leakage - then jot down the International Mobile Equipment Identity number."]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberenviro.org/2009/ny-daily-news-nypd-tracking-cell-phone-owners-foes-arent-sure-its-legal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU: YouAreBeingWatched.US</title>
		<link>http://cyberenviro.org/2009/you-are-being-watched-us/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberenviro.org/2009/you-are-being-watched-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gtdonovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregorydonovan.org/cyberenviro/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You ARE being watched, US. Since 9/11 Homeland Security has pumped an enormous amount of money into public surveillance technologies (online and off). Yet, as most recent studies are showing, the presence of this surveillance does nothing to reduce crime &#8230; <a href="http://cyberenviro.org/2009/you-are-being-watched-us/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify">You <strong>ARE</strong> being watched, US. Since 9/11 Homeland Security has pumped an enormous amount of money into public surveillance technologies (online and off). Yet, as most recent studies are showing, the presence of this surveillance does nothing to reduce crime or make people more safe. So, what is this surveillance being funded for?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">To help ask this question, and to bring the public&#8217;s attention to the rise of a surveillance society, the American Civil Liberties Union has setup an educational website. Check it out: <a href="http://cyberenviro.org/wp-admin/http:/youarebeingwatched.us" target="_blank"></a><strong><a href="http://youarebeingwatched.us" target="_blank">http://youarebeingwatched.us</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberenviro.org/2009/you-are-being-watched-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

