<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cyberenviro.org &#187; att</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberenviro.org/tag/att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberenviro.org</link>
	<description>the political ecology of informational development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg: U.S. Files Antitrust Complaint to Block AT&amp;T / T-Mobile Merger</title>
		<link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-31/u-s-files-antitrust-complaint-to-block-proposed-at-t-t-mobile-merger.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-31/u-s-files-antitrust-complaint-to-block-proposed-at-t-t-mobile-merger.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gtdonovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Telekom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregorydonovan.org/cyberenviro/?p=2035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The U.S. government sued to block AT&#38;T’s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA Inc., saying the deal would “substantially lessen competition” in the wireless market &#8230; the U.S. is seeking a declaration that Dallas-based AT&#38;T’s takeover of T-Mobile, a &#8230; <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-31/u-s-files-antitrust-complaint-to-block-proposed-at-t-t-mobile-merger.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The U.S. government sued to block AT&amp;T’s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA Inc., saying the deal would “substantially lessen competition” in the wireless market &#8230; the U.S. is seeking a declaration that Dallas-based AT&amp;T’s takeover of T-Mobile, a unit of Deutsche Telekom AG, would violate U.S. antitrust law.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-31/u-s-files-antitrust-complaint-to-block-proposed-at-t-t-mobile-merger.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Personhood: SCOTUS Rules No Personal Privacy for AT&amp;T</title>
		<link>http://cyberenviro.org/2011/welcome-to-personhood/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberenviro.org/2011/welcome-to-personhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gtdonovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FoIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregorydonovan.org/cyberenviro/?p=1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court, after recognizing corporations as legal persons in their Citizens United decision, has now ruled that AT&#38;T does not have a right to personal privacy. Welcome to personhood, AT&#38;T! Here&#8217;s some background: AT&#38;T over-prices some of the equipment &#8230; <a href="http://cyberenviro.org/2011/welcome-to-personhood/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court, after recognizing corporations as legal persons in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission" target="_blank">their Citizens United decision</a>, has now ruled that <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-supreme-court-att-doesnt-have-personal-privacy-rights/" target="_blank">AT&amp;T does not have a right to personal privacy</a>. Welcome to personhood, AT&amp;T!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some background: AT&amp;T over-prices some of the equipment it was selling to schools (<em>schools!</em>). The FCC investigates. AT&amp;T&#8217;s competitors file a FoIA to make the investigation&#8217;s findings public. AT&amp;T claims the FoIA request is a violation of their personal privacy. The SCOTUS denies their right to personal privacy. AT&amp;T and other corporations join the ranks of the rest of us &#8220;persons&#8221; who are given no right to personal privacy in the US.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth remembering that this is the very same AT&amp;T that denies their own customers a right to personal privacy. From <a href="http://articles.sfgate.com/2006-06-21/business/17300043_1_privacy-policy-customer-s-data-electronic-privacy-information-center" target="_blank">SFGate.com</a>, <em>waaaaaay</em> back in 2006:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>AT&amp;T has issued an updated privacy policy that takes effect Friday &#8230; The new policy says that AT&amp;T &#8212; not customers &#8212; owns customers&#8217; confidential info and can use it &#8220;to protect its legitimate business interests, safeguard others, or respond to legal process.&#8221;</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The policy also indicates that AT&amp;T will track the viewing habits of customers of its new video service &#8212; something that cable and satellite providers are prohibited from doing &#8230; The company&#8217;s policy overhaul follows recent reports that AT&amp;T was one of several leading telecom providers that allowed the National Security Agency warrantless access to its voice and data networks as part of the Bush administration&#8217;s war on terror.</em></p>
<p>Irony abounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberenviro.org/2011/welcome-to-personhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>wiretapping &#8211; at&amp;t&#8217;s new marketing strategy</title>
		<link>http://cyberenviro.org/2008/wiretapping-atts-new-marketing-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberenviro.org/2008/wiretapping-atts-new-marketing-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gtdonovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregorydonovan.org/cyberenviro/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been meaning to write about this for a while now, but what with article deadlines, ecycolpedia entries, the NUDA Summer School, and Euro-SSIG, I&#8217;m just now getting around to it. Back in June, at&#38;t briefly flirted with the idea &#8230; <a href="http://cyberenviro.org/2008/wiretapping-atts-new-marketing-strategy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify">I&#8217;ve been meaning to write about this for a while now, but what with article deadlines, ecycolpedia entries, the <a href="http://www.gregorydonovan.org/Sommerskolen18-19.pdf">NUDA Summer School</a>, and <a href="http://www.euro-ssig.eu/" target="_blank">Euro-SSIG</a>, I&#8217;m just now getting around to it. Back in June, at&amp;t briefly flirted with <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyberenvironmentalism/2628694643/in/set-72157604360909594"><img class="alignright alignfull" style="border: 1px solid black;float: right;margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px;margin-top: 3px;margin-bottom: 3px" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3164/2628694643_f32b99522b_o.jpg" border="0" alt="simplify. organize. liberate?" width="354" height="308" /></a>the idea of using the <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70619" target="_blank">scandal surrounding their illegal wiretapping of U.S. citizens&#8217; domestic and international communications</a> as an actual marketing strategy. At the time I took screen shots and video of the campaign that was mockingly dubbed by at&amp;t as &#8220;The Online Liberation Movement (sm).&#8221; Shortly after going live at&amp;t pulled the entire campaign in light of public outrage.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">&#8220;The Online Liberation Movement (sm),&#8221; with its &#8220;simplify. organize. liberate.&#8221; motto,  <span>is a collection of fictitious individuals who seek cyber-liberation through at&amp;t&#8217;s online billing system (of course). Most interesting is &#8220;Ms. Suspicious,&#8221; a member of the &#8220;movement&#8221; who is presented as a paranoid, privacy-obsessed and &#8220;suspicious&#8221; customer. Below is a video recording I made of the ad, note Ms. Suspicious&#8217;s &#8220;keep out!&#8221; post-it on her laptop and the poster behind her of Uncle Sam&#8217;s hand covering a man&#8217;s mouth above the words &#8220;SILENCE means security.&#8221;</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">So, why is Ms. Suspicious so damn&#8230; suspicious? It couldn&#8217;t have anything to do with <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/06/att-whistleblow.html" target="_blank">at&amp;t&#8217;s illegal partnership with the NSA to spy on Americans</a>, their development of a <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/att-invents-pro.html" target="_blank">mass surveillance programing language</a>,  their recent <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070809-pearl-jam-censored-by-att-calls-for-a-neutral-net.html" target="_blank">censorship of Pearl Jam</a>, or their anti-free speech <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus10oct10,0,3302315,print.column?coll=la-home-business" target="_blank">&#8220;can’t-criticize-us&#8221; contracts</a> that all their customers must abide by. Nope, Ms. Suspicious is just some freaky civil libertarian who needs to calm down and find liberation through at&amp;t&#8217;s new online banking system&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">
<p style="text-align: justify">
<p style="text-align: left">
<p style="text-align: left">
<p style="text-align: left">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberenviro.org/2008/wiretapping-atts-new-marketing-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

